Garnishment Archives - Wetherington Hamilton, P.A.

The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), formally known as the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act, is a federal law affording certain protections to military members in civil actions under 50 U.S.C., and it’s extremely important to consider the protections this law provides and the ramifications it may have on civil actions and proceedings.

This federal law applies to members of the uniformed services such as the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard. The purpose of the Act is to provide certain protections to military members who have obligations that are affected by their active military service. The protections provided under the law may affect a number of actions such as entry of default judgments, mortgage obligations, eviction processes, collections practices, and other debts or obligations that were entered into by a military member.

The protections cover individuals during their time in service and for a period of time after completing service. As such, it is crucial to determine the military status of a defendant before proceeding with a civil action that may be covered under SCRA. In bringing forth an action, the Plaintiff must verify whether the defendant is on active military duty and provide the court with an affidavit setting forth the defendant’s military status or stating that military status is unable to be determined. The affidavit must be filed before the court can enter a default judgment and in some instances, a court appointed guardian must represent the interests of the defendant in order to proceed with the action unless the defendant waives their rights under the act in writing.

A service member may request a stay of the legal proceedings if the member’s current military duty requirements materially affect the member’s ability to appear and if military leave is not authorized by a commanding officer. In debt collection practices, a court order staying the action could prevent the entry of a judgment or the attachment of a garnishment. In a foreclosure action, the lender must get a court order to foreclose on a service member if the action is brought during the debtor’s active military service. Service members may also be afforded protections during an eviction process or if they are terminating an apartment or vehicle lease, however most of these protections apply to those debts or obligations that were entered into prior to active military service.

The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act can pose a number of issues and restrictions on civil proceedings, therefore it is important to be familiar with the Act and to be in compliance with all of the applicable requirements.

Ashley Simon, Esq.

Florida’s garnishment law contains detailed procedural requirements and specific deadlines within which a creditor, debtor and garnishee must file and serve specific pleadings and other documents. A judgment creditor must be aware and alert to these procedures in order to ensure that the creditor does not lose substantive rights, and in order to take prompt advantage of inaction by the debtor and/or garnishee.

A judgment creditor has a right to a writ of garnishment as to any debt due to the judgment debtor from a third person; and any of the debtor’s tangible or intangible personal property in the possession of a third person. In order to be subject to garnishment, a debt owed by a third person to the judgment debtor must be absolute and without contingency. A judgment creditor may successfully garnish a joint bank account to the extent of the judgment debtor’s interest in same, but may not garnish an account held by the debtor and his/her spouse as tenants by the entireties (unless the creditor has a judgment against both spouses).

Prior to October 1, 1993, the State, its agencies and subdivisions were immune from garnishment. Beginning October 1, 1993, however, a debtor’s status as an employee of the State or its agencies or political subdivisions does not preclude a judgment creditor’s right to garnish the debtor’s wages. The garnishment must arise, however, as a result of a contract, a loan, a transaction, a purchase, a sale, a transfer, or a conversion occurring on or after October 1, 1998.

A judgment creditor may obtain a continuing writ of garnishment as to a judgment debtor’s employer, providing for periodic payment to the creditor of a permissible portion of the debtor’s salary or wages as they become due.

The garnishee becomes liable to the judgment creditor for all debts due to the garnishee and any property of the debtor in the garnishee’s control from the time the writ is served to the time the garnishee serves its answer. The garnishee must report any such debt or property in its answer and must retain any deposit, account, or tangible or intangible personal property of the debtor. (Limitation: the garnishee cannot retain assets equal in value to more than twice the judgment amount and/or the amount stated in the judgment creditor’s writ of garnishment). Once a bank account has been garnished the bank must retain the depositor’s funds in compliance with the writ. The bank may not pay certain checks out of the garnished account, regardless of whether the checks predate the service of the writ of garnishment.

Dealing with a judgment and attempting to enforce it through garnishment is a complicated process that is best done with the consultation of an experienced attorney. Call Wetherington Hamilton today to schedule your consultation.

Thomas K. Sciarrino, Jr., Esq.

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) – Protections and Ramifications

Enforcing a Judgment Through Garnishment

Wetherington Hamilton, P.A.

Wetherington Hamilton, P.A.

Tag Archive for: Garnishment

Wetherington Hamilton, P.A.

Wetherington Hamilton, P.A.